Halloween is a time for imagination, creativity, in short, pretense.
Pretending to be something creepy, pretending an abandoned barn is a haunted house, pretending to be hungry and begging door-to-door for nutritious candy.
Unfortunately, while Halloween is all about fantasy, life is full of authentic spookiness. Some aspects of reality are really frightful and destructive.
Near the top of the list of Real Spookiness is
BPA (Bisphenol-A).
Of course, the FDA, inept as usual, claims it's
unable to regulate BPA. Classified as an "indirect food additive" makes it exempt from federal scrutiny. Isn't that convenient?
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
BPA toxin is widely distributed in our food and drink.
[QUOTE]
The chemical, used to line most food and beverage cans, has been found in the urine of 93% of Americans tested.
The agency now considers BPA to be of some concern for effects on the brain, behavior and prostate glands of fetuses and the very young.
Scientific studies have raised concerns about the chemical's link to breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, reproductive failures and behavioral problems.
The FDA did not ban the chemical, although top scientists, including Linda Birnbaum, director of the National Toxicology Program, say they consider the safety of BPA to be uncertain.
[END QUOTE]
The Greenest Dollar in
The Dangers of BPA provides more details.
[QUOTE]
According to the
Environmental Working Group (EWG), the FDA established safety guidelines for BPA back in 1987. But, their standards are woefully out of date. The so called “safe levels” that the industry is currently going by is over 25 times the amount known to cause birth defects. The levels need to be much, much lower than they are.
Another disturbing fact is that the
U.S. National Toxicology Program’s 2001 assessment of BPA relied heavily on
industry-sponsored research. Not surprisingly, the research put out by the chemical companies showed that BPA causes no adverse effects.
This is just like using research sponsored by cigarette companies to see if a smoking habit is harmful on your lungs. Of
course they’re going to say it’s safe!
According to
Fast Company, there are only five companies in the United States that make BPA: Bayer, Dow, Hexion Speciality Chemicals, Sunoco, and SABIC Innovative Plastics. Together, they rake in $6 billion per year manufacturing BPA. So, it’s entirely in their best interests to show that BPA is safe.
[END QUOTE]
A new report just came out today.
Kaiser Permanente reveals new research findings on the
negative effects of BPA.
[QUOTE]
Funded by the
U.S. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, this new study adds to emerging human evidence questioning the safety of BPA, a chemical created in the production of polycarbonated plastics and epoxy resins found in baby bottles, plastic containers, the linings of cans used for food and beverages, and in dental sealants.
The five-year study recruited 514 workers in factories in China and compared workers who had high urine BPA levels with those with low urine BPA. Men with higher urine BPA levels had 2–4 times the risk of having poor semen quality, including low sperm concentration, low sperm vitality and motility.
This is among the first human studies to report an adverse association between BPA and semen quality. Previous animal studies found a detrimental association between BPA and male reproductive systems in mice and rats.
“Compared with men without detectable urine BPA, those with detectable urine BPA had more than three times the risk of lowered sperm concentration and lower sperm vitality, more than four times the risk of a lower sperm count, and more than twice the risk of lower sperm motility,” said the study’s lead author Dr. Li, a reproductive and perinatal epidemiologist at Kaiser Permanente’s Division of Research
in Oakland, Calif.
[END QUOTE]